The true and fair view concept: the palette of controversial points (of “worth banning” to “worth keeping”)

Yana Ustinova

Cite: Yana Ustinova. The true and fair view concept: the palette of controversial points (of “worth banning” to “worth keeping”). Journal of Digital Art & Humanities, 2(1), pp. 39-47. https://doi.org/10.33847/2712-8148.2.1_4

Abstract. Dynamic changes and observed crisis phenomena in the economy, as well as high-profile accounting scandals of recent decades and subsequent revisions of accounting standards, necessitate a critical assessment of the conceptual framework for preparing financial statements that are adequate to the real state of affairs. At the same time, the accumulated practice of applying the true and fair view concept revealed some shortcomings.In this situation, the center of attraction of researchers’ interest is the question of whether this concept meets the modern challenges of accounting, whether it is advisable to preserve and develop it. The aim of the article: an overview of the main research trends describing the significance of this concept for the current state of accounting, an assessment of the stages of their development. The analysis was carried out through research of scientific publications. The result was the identification of the main researching areas of the true and fair view concept, an analysis of their changes over time, an overview of the current increment of scientific knowledge, and the factors that led to such an increment for the last few years. In the course of the work, the areas of emerging scientific interest, as well as areas of maintaining scientific interest, were noted from the position of enriching theoretical and practical knowledge about the applicability of the concept. Special attention was drawn to the following issues: the relationship between overrides from accounting standards and the quality of financial statements, options for interpreting the concept by various groups of users of financial statements in settings of the legal and socio-cultural context differences, the role of auditors in assessing of the compliance with this concept. In conclusion were called the arguments of supporters to recognize this concept as worthy of banning, as well as the arguments of supporters to recognize this concept as worthy of keeping. Prospective directions of future scientific research in this direction were proposed.

Keywords: accounting standards, financial statements, the true and fair view concept.

References

  1. McGee, A. (1991). The “True and Fair View” Debate: A Study in the Legal Regulation of Accounting. The Modern Law Review, 54(6), 874-888.
  2. Lee, G.A. (1981). Modern financial accounting. Nelson, Walton on Thames, Surrey.
  3. Alexander, D. & Archer, S. (2003). On economic reality, representational faithfulness and the “true and fair override”. Accounting and Business Research, 33(1), 33.
  4. Amat, O., Blake, J. & Oliveras, E. (1999). The Struggle against Creative Accounting: Is ‘True and Fair View’ part of the problem or part of the solution? UPF Economics Working Paper № 363. University Pompeu Fabra.
  5. Blake, J. & Higson, A. (1992). A consideration of the significance and value of the «neutrality» concept in Financial Accounting. Accounting Forum, September, 4-32.
  6. Mayson, S.W., French, D. & Ryan, C.L. (1989). Company Law. Blackstone Press, London
  7. Tweedie, D. (1988). Imagine field versus the rule book: which is the answer to creative accounting. Pacific Accounting Review, December, 1-21.
  8. Ciocan, C.C. & Georgescu, I. (2018). An analysis of the International research on their relationship between prudence and true and fair view in financial reporting. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics, 2018, 16.
  9. Ustinova, Y.I. (2019). Development of the concept of a reliable and conscientious view on the formation of financial reporting abroad: the dialectics of business freedom and protection of public interest. Finance and Business, 15(3), 103-119.
  10. Kirk, N.E. (2001). True and fair view ‘versus’ Present fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Discussion Paper Series Massey University. (208).
  11. Karan, R. (2002). Irreconcilable Legal and Accounting Views of “A True and Fair View”: An Emerging Alternative from Australian Reforms, Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference. Journal of Law and Financial Management, 1(1), 50.
  12. Hamilton, G. & O’Hogartaigh, C. (2009). The Third Policeman: “The true and fair view”, language and habitues of accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(8), 910-920.
  13. Ratnatunga J. (2016). The accounting delusion: faith and trust in IFRS reports // Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 14(1), 1-22.
  14. Somoza, A. (2009). Some considerations about Fairview: special reference to the project of Conceptual Framework IASB-FASB. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  15. Tuszkiewicz, M. (2018). The problem of preserving the principle of true and fair view on examples. In book 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences & Art SGEM 2018, 18 (pp.417-424). Sofia.
  16. Jastezebowski, A., Wierzbinski, M. (2019). Influence of representation of mezzanine capital on the rule of true and fair view Global Versus Local Perspectives on Finance and Accounting. ACFA 2018. In book Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics (pp. 211-216). NY: Springer.
  17. Sunder, S. (2010). “True and fair” as the moral compass of financial reporting. Research of Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 14, 3-11.
  18. Livne, G. & McNichols, M. (2009). An empirical investigation of the true and fair override in the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 36(1), 1-30.
  19. Ho, H. (2017). A case study of true and fair view override in Financial Reporting. Nang Yan Business Journal,  5(1), 13-19.
  20. Alexander, D. & Grottke, M. (2016). A True and Fair View of harmonization in accounting in the European Union. Siena Accounting and Regulation workshop.
  21. Meuthen, M.H. (2017). Qou vadis European true and fair view? The integration of Continental European and Anglo-Saxon stakeholder protection interests // Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-1), 276-283.
  22. Vergoossen, R.A. (2016). Brexit and the true and fair view principle. MAB, 7(8), 290-291.
  23. Avi, M.S. (2017). The “tax-true and fiscal-fair” principle in Italian financial reporting. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal,  21(3), 1-22.
  24. Avi, M.S. (2018). The true and fair principle in Italy: Impact of tax legislation on final financial statements assessments // J Fin Mark, 2(1), 1-10.
  25. Salihin, A., Fatima, A.H. & Ousama, A.A. (2014). An Islamic perspective on the true and fair view override principle. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 5(2), 142-157.
  26. Salihin, A., Fatima, A.H. & Ousama, A.A. (2015). Analysis of the true and fair view concept: an Islamic perspective. International Journal Managerial and Financial Accounting, 7(1), 38-61.
  27. Gonzalo-Angulo, J.A., Garvey, A.M., Parte, L. (2018). Perceptions of true and fair view: effects of professional status and maturity. In Modeling, Dynamics, Optimization and Bioeconomics III. DGS 2016. BIOECONOMY 2015. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics (pp. 159-186). NY: Springer.
  28. Garvey, A.M., Gonzalo-Angulo, J.A., Parte, L. (2017). Cognitive load theory: limiting the gap between academics and students in accounting and auditing. Review of Business and Legal Sciences, 28, 5-28.
  29. Garvey, A.M., Parte, L., McNally, B., Gonzalo-Angulo, J.A. (2021). True and fair override: Accounting expert opinions, explanations from behavioural theories, and discussions for sustainability accounting. Sustainability, 13(1928), 1-23.
  30. Gonzalo-Angulo, J.A., Garvey, A.M. (2017). Do audit firms take the true and fair view override with a grain of salt? In book Colegio de Economistas Murcia (eds.) Accounting, Auditing and Business in a Global Economy (pp.124-137).
  31. Brabete, V. & Dragan, C. (2008). How true and fair is the true and fair view in accountancy? PrePEc, January, 766-773.

Published online 26.06.2021