Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong
Alliance of Bioversity & CIAT, CSIR Campus, Accra, Ghana
Cite: Ofosu-Ampong K. Gender Differences in Perception of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools. JDAH 4(2), 52-56, (2023). https://doi.org/10.33847/2712-8149.4.2_6
Abstract. Participation of girls in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) subjects at the higher education (HE) level continues to lag behind that of boys and consequently may affect artificial intelligence proliferation in Ghana. Numerous factors affect girls’ engagement in science, one of which is the mistaken belief among girls that STEM subjects are better suited for boys. This study investigates the gender differences in AI-based tools which have become integral for teaching and learning in HE schools. Based on results from 128 students in higher education in Ghana, this article argues that gender is a significant determinant of students’ use of AI-based tools in education. The results further revealed a significant disparity in the overall levels of perceived innovation characteristics based on gender. This study urges managers of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to implement policies and measures aimed at facilitating women’s engagement and greater familiarity with AI technologies.
Keywords: Gender, Perception, Artificial intelligence.
References
1. Ofosu-Ampong, K., Acheampong, B., Kevor, MO, & Amankwah-Sarfo, F. (2023). Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) in Education: Trust, Innovativeness and Psychological Need of Students. Information and Knowledge Management, 13(4), 37-47.
2. Highet, C., Skelly, H. and Alexandra T. (2017). Gender and Information Communication Technology (ICT) Survey Toolkit. Washington DC: USAID, https://2012- 2017.usaid.gov/documents/15396/gender-and-ict-toolkit
3. Treuthart, M. P. (2019). Connectivity: The Global Gender Digital Divide and Its Implications for Women’s Human Rights and Equality. Gonzaga Journal of International Law, 23, 1.
4. Bryant, J. (2022a) Digital technologies and inclusion in humanitarian response. HPG report. London: ODI
5. Eccles, J. S. (2015). Gendered socialization of STEM interests in the family. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 116-132.
6. Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883-900.
7. Kiwanuka, A. (2015). Acceptance process: The missing link between UTAUT and diffusion of innovation theory. American Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 40-44.
8. Duan, Y., He, Q., Feng, W., Li, D., & Fu, Z. (2010). A study on e-learning take-up intention from an innovation adoption perspective: A case in China. Computers & Education, 55(1), 237-246.
9. Emre, D. (2019). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of barriers to technology integration in education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 381-398.
10. Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review on artificial intelligence in education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(206).
11. Ofosu-Ampong, K., Boateng, R., Kolog, E. A., & Anning-Dorson, T. (2020, June). Examining Information Quality and Perceived Learning Performance in a Gamified Environment. In 2020 IEEE 22nd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) (Vol. 2, pp. 1-9). IEEE.
Published online 13.12.2023
