Utibe Titus, Aluko Bayode
Adeleke University, Ede, Nigeria
Cite: Titus U., Bayode A. Election, Technology and Political Participation in Nigeria: A Theoretical Review. JDAH 5(2), 3-15, (2024). https://doi.org/10.33847/2712-8149.5.2_1
Abstract. This study examines the impact of technology on political participation in Nigeria. Methodologically, data were collected through secondary sources available on electronic political processes across African countries. The data gathered were analysed to understand nexus between election technological innovation and its impacts on political participation in Nigeria. The study found out that election technology had made it easier for citizens to participate politically and also technology has improved transparency in elections and democratic processes in Nigeria. It also found out that there is positive perception towards using technology for increasing political participation amongst Nigerian citizens when compared to traditional methods such as paper ballots or manual counting systems. It further highlights how widespread adoption of digital technologies has enabled more people from been disenfranchised in Nigeria to actively participate in electoral processes thereby contributing towards social change and opening up possibilities for greater involvement by citizens in effective decision making at all levels. The paper suggested that technology has had a significant impact on the electoral process, and the implications of these technological changes should not be underestimated.
Keywords: Democracy, Electronic Election, Political participation, Electoral violence, Integrity.
References
1. Titus, U. M., Aluko, B.: Information communication technology (ICT) the management of election in Nigeria: A study of Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS). Contemporary Journal of Politics and Administration Redemer’s University, Ede , 2 (1) (2023).
2. Pommerolle, M, E., Perrot, S,. Willis. J. : La Fabrique du Vote: Placer la Matérialité au Coeur de L’analyse. Politique Africaine, 144: 5–26 (2016).
3. Cheeseman, N,. Lynch, G. , Willis, J.: Digital dilemmas: the unintended consequences of election technology, Democratization, 25(8), 1397-1418 (2018). DOI:10.1080/13510347.2018.1470165
4. Al-Rawy M., Elci A. Secure i-Voting Scheme with Blockchain Technology and Blind Signature. J. Digit. Sci. 1(1), 3-14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.33847/2686-8296.1.1_1.
5. Jega, A.M.: Electoral reforms in Nigeria: Prospects and challenges. A Lecture by the Chairman, INEC of Nigeria, at the 7th International Electoral Affairs Symposium, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2013).
6. Nwangu, C. Onah, V.C.O., Otuh, O. A. Elixir of electoral fraud: The impact of digital technology on the 2015 general elections in Nigeria. Cogent Social Sciences 4: 19 (2018).
7. Cheeseman, N. & Klaas, B. (2018). How to Rig an Election. New Haven and London: Yale University Press
8. Jega, A. M. Improving elections in Nigeria: Lessons from 2011 and looking to 2015. African Programme Meeting Summary, 4 July. London: Chatham House (2012).
9. Abdulkadir, A. A.: Securing Credible Elections in Africa through ICT: An Appraisal of Nigeria. AUDRI, 14, (1), 5-19 (2021).
10. Titus U. Impacts of Interview as Research Instrument of Data Collection in Social Sciences. Journal of Digital Art & Humanities, Vol.1, Iss.1, pp. 15-24. https://doi.org/10.33847/2712-8148.1.1_2.
11.Yard, M. “Direct Democracy: Progress and Pitfalls of Election Technology.” In International Foundation for Electoral Systems, edited by M. Yard, 8–12. Arlington, VA: IFES (2010).
12. Evrensel, A. Introduction.” In Voter Registration in Africa: A Comparative Analysis, edited by Evrensel Astrid, 1–56. Johannesburg: EISA, 2010, (2010).
13. Garson, G. D. Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, (2006).
14. Dafoe, A. On technological determinism: A typology, scope, conditions and a mechanism. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40 (6),1047–1076 (2015).
15. Wyatt, L. Technological determinism is dead; long live technological determinism. In: Hackett EJ, et al. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. London: The MIT Press, pp.165–180 (2008).
16. Gelb. A., Clark, J. Identification for development: The biometrics revolution. Working Paper No. 315. Washington, DC: Centre for Global Development (CGD) (2013).
17. Harvey, D.: The Fetish of Technology: Causes and Consequences. Macalester International 13(7) (2003). Available at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/macintl/vol13/iss1/7
18. Golden M, K. E, Ofosu, G. : Electoral fraud and biometric identification machine failure in a competitive democracy (2014). Available at: https://columbiacpseminar.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/goldenkramon-ofosu.pdf
19. Hobbis, S. K., Hobbis, G.: Voter integrity, trust and the promise of digital technologies: Biometric voter registration in Solomon Islands. Anthropological Forum, 27 (2), 114–134 (2017).
Ishkanian, A. “Armenia’s Election: The Status Quo Wins at the Expense of Democracy.” LSE Blog, European Politics and Policy, 4 April (2017). blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/04/04/armenias-election-the-status-quo-wins-attheexpense-of-democracy/
20. Barkan, J.: Kenya’s 2013 Elections. Technology is Not Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 24 (3)156–165(2013).
21. Aluko, B. : Electoral Violence and Democratic Fragility in Three Selected States in South-West, Nigeria (1999-2019), PhD Dissertation, Adeleke University (2022).
22. Balyakin A., Taranenko S., Nurbina M., Titov M. Social Aspects of Big Data Technology Implementation. J. Digit. Sci. 1(1), 15-24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.33847/2686-8296.1.1_2
23. Osunyikanmi, A. F. Technology, Elections and Democracy: Lessons for Nigeria. International Journal of Operational Research in Management, Social Sciences & Education, 4 (1), 199-213 (2018).
24.Omilusi, M.: Rituals of Democracy: Reflections on the 2019 General Elections in Nigeria, Prime Publishers & Educational Services (2021).
25. Verba, S., Nie, N.: Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York Harper and Row, Publishers (1972).
26. Van Deth, J.W. What is Political Participation? Politics (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.68
27. This Day. Technological Innovations and the 2013 General Elections (2022). http://www.thisdaylive.com
28. Shackelford, S., Bruce, S., Michael, S., Anne, B., Ben, B., Amanda N. C. D., Trey, H., Jessica, M. S.: Making Democracy Harder to Hack. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 50, 629 (2016).
29. Glidden, J. A.: Election Monitoring, Technology and the Promotion of Democracy: A Case for International Standards. Wisconsin Int’l Law Journal, 19 (3), 353–368 (2000).
30. Ahmed A. M., Usman, M.: The impact of technology on Nigeria’s democratic development: An analysis of the Card Reading Machine. Int. J. Multidisciplinary Res Modern Edu. 1:2 (2015).
31. Adullahi, A., Kalgo, M. A. : Digital Technology and Credible Elections in Nigeria: Evidence from the 2019 Election. Sokoto Journal of Social Sciences Conference Edition, 1:219, 1-12 (2019).
32. Fatai, A.: Smart card readers and the quality of the 2019 general elections in Nigeria: successes and challenges, The Round Table,109:4,396405 (2020). DOI:10.1080/00358533.2020.1788755
33. Alausa, D.W Akingbade, L.O: Electronic Voting: Challenges and Prospects in Nigeria’s Democracy, International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 6 (5), 67-76 (2017).
34. The Punch 2023: INEC budgets N117bn for anti-hacking software, others (2023). https://punchng.com/2023-inec-budgets-n117bn-for-anti-hacking-software-others/
35. Okwueze, F. O.: Interrogating the Cost of Digital Technology and Trust in Elections in Africa: The Nigerian Perspective. Africa Development, XLVII, (2), 199-217 (2022).
36. Amoah, M.: Sleight is right: Cyber control as a new battleground for African elections. African Affairs 119 (474), 68–89 (2019).
37. Debrah, E., Effah, J., Owusu-Mensah, I.: Does the use of a biometric system guarantee and acceptable election’s outcome: Evidence from Ghana’s 2012 election. African Studies 78 (3), 347–369 (2019).
38. Collins, O. , Karuti, K.: Election Technology, Disputes, and Political Violence in Kenya. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 1–14 (2020).
39. Calista, D. J., Melitski, J. : E-Government and e-governance: A convergence of public sector information and communication technologies. Public Administration Quarterly 31(1/2), 87–120 (2007).
40. Janda, K, Berry, J.M, Goldman, J., Schildkraut, D. : The Challenges of Democracy: American Government in Global Politics, Wadsworth Censage Learning (2014).
41. Agbu, O.: Election rigging and the use of technology: Smart card reader as the Joker in Nigeria’s 2015 presidential elections. Journal of African Elections, 15(2), 70–90 (2016). https://doi.org/10.20940/JAE/2016/v15i2a542. Mugica, A.: The case for election technology. European View, 14: 111–119 (2015).
Published online 23.12.2024