Digitalization and Backward Design take the finance teaching techniques and study plan strategy one step further

Narcisa Roxana Moşteanu

American University of Malta, Malta

Cite: Moşteanu N.R. Digitalization and Backward Design take the finance teaching techniques and study plan strategy one step further. J. Digit. Art Humanit., 2(2), 22-32.

Abstract. Digitization has been around for several years, but its use has become a necessity with the Covid-19 pandemic. Lockdown forced us to work remotely overnight, to use digital networks to communicate, make payments, learn all sectors of activity were forced to adapt to the digital age in one night. This paper shows how teaching, research, and the study plan must adapt to the new communication requirements and students’ needs to achieve the course learning outcomes in a virtual environment. The paper proposes a realistic academic plan design – backward. Taking into account new environmental and digital challenges, the backward design facilitates the decision on the content of the study plan, the elimination of less important parts, and the application of new communication and assessment techniques.

Keywords: digitalization; backward design; teaching techniques for finance.


  1. Carrithers D., Ling W.C.T, Bean J.: Messy problems and lay audiences: Teaching critical thinking within the finance curriculum / Business Communication Quarterly, 71(2), pp. 152-170 (2008).
  2. Sharma A.: Use of Bloomberg Professional in support of finance and economics teaching / Cogent Economics & Finance, 3(1), pp. 1115618 (2015).
  3. Wang H., Cao C., Guan N., Huang Z.: Evaluation System Design for Application of Innovative Teaching Methods in Major of Construction Management: Case Study in a University of Finance and Economics / ICCREM 2018: Construction Enterprises and Project Management, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 157-166. Reston (2018).
  4. Márquez-Ramos L.: Does digitalization in higher education help to bridge the gap between academia and industry? An application to COVID-19 / Industry and Higher Education (2021).
  5. Moşteanu N.R.: Education, qualification awareness and social civism to build and sustain a healthy and developed society / 28th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, Marseille, France, EUBCE, pp. 6-7 (2020).
  6. Moşteanu N.R., Faccia A., Cavaliere L.P.L., Bhatia S.: Digital technologies’ implementation within financial and banking system during socio distancing restrictions–back to the future”, IJARET, 11(6), pp. 307-315 (2020).
  7. Moşteanu N.R.: Financial and economic policies for a sustainable development through Green Economy and Artificial Intelligence / 28th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, Marseille, France, EUBCE, pp. 917-920 (2020).
  8. Jiao Y., Li X., Zeng R.: Finance Course Reform Exploring Based on Financial Technique Background / DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science (2019).
  9. Chetty L.: Innovative interpretive qualitative case study research method aligned with systems theory for physiotherapy and rehabilitation research: A review of the methodology / African Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, 5(1-2), pp. 40-44 (2013).
  10. Angen M.J.: Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue / Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), pp. 378-395 (2020).
  11. Moşteanu N.R. Teaching techniques adapted for online delivery to achieve course learning outcomes in a virtual environment. J. Digit. Art Humanit., 2(2), 22-32. (2021).
  12. Moşteanu N.R.: Assessment of teaching and learning techniques for online environment. How to maintain students’ attention and achieve course learning outcomes in a virtual environment using new technology. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies. Forthcoming (2022).
  13. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S.: Introduction — the discipline and practice of qualitative research / Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oakes: Sage, pp. 3 (2008).
  14. Waytz A., Gray K., Epley N., Wegner D.M.: Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in cognitive sciences / 14(8), pp. 383-388 (2010)
  15. Nickerson R.S.: How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others / Psychological bulletin, 25(6), pp. 737 (1999).
  16. Fischhoff B., Beyth R.: I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once—future things”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), pp. 1-16 (1975).
  17. URL: , last accessed 2021/10/25
  18. Bain K.: What the best college teachers do / Harvard University Press (2004).
  19. Hockings C.: Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education: a synthesis of research / York: Higher Education Academy (2010).
  20. Wiggins G.P., McTighe J.: The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units / ASCD (2011). 
  21. Moşteanu N.R.: Digital Campus–a future former investment in education for a sustainable society / E3S Web of Conferences, 234, pp. 00029. EDP Sciences (2021).
  22. Moşteanu N.R.: Digital University Campus–Change the Education System Approach To Meet The 21st Century Needs / European Journal of Human Resource Management Studies, 4(4), pp. 79-93 (2020)
  23. URL:, last accessed 2021/06/12

Published online 29.12.2021